From OLTP to SAP
MGMT 550
Georgetown School of Business
On-Line Transaction Processing
- historic core of information systems
- originally with strict cost benefit analyses
- organisationally within the accounting function
- individual applications for different parts of the organisation
- accumulation of enormous amounts of data
The search for linkage
- how to couple information with business strategy?
- needs of strategists
- needs of IS managers
Business strategists
- were looking everywhere and anywhere for competitive advantage
- believed that high IS expenditure and performance low and poorly coupled to the organisation
- wanted to control proliferation of spending
- found IS a barrier to strategic moves
IS managers wanted to
- manage the complexity of their empires
- control the challenge of growing spending in the organisation
- plan and maintain IS and telecoms
- develop perception of IS as infrastructure
- needed input for formal planning methodologies
- overcome barriers to cost-benefit analysis
- respond to strategic moves by the organisation
Is the IS function really different?
- seemingly obsessive need for strategy
- more systematic than many “disciplines”
- yet, still an immature field
- isolation in the organisation
- not historically involved in strategy formulation
Vested interests in moving to SIS
- IS function
- corporate management
- consultants
- academics
- computer industry
Consultants
- intellectual mercenaries
- improve the performance of organisations
- identifying opportunities
- implementing opportunities
Role of academics
- clichés, case studies and simple recipes
- raised awareness
- increased importance in business-schools
For example:
- Pyburn (1983)
- Ives and Learmonth (1984)
- Porter and Millar (1985)
- Keen (1986)
Computer industry
- need to maintain growth of sales
- R&D costs
- ever shorter life-cycles
Porter and Millar
- recognition of the importance and ubiquity of information technology (in value chain)
- changes to industry structure
- creation of new business opportunities
- possibilities for competitive advantage (lower costs and improve differentiation)
- embedding technology in products
Information intensity matrix
Strategic Information Systems
- turned out to be a fashion
- not sustainable as competitive advantage
- often a "strategic necessity"
- "virtual value chains”" (HRB, Nov ‘95)
Examples -- clichés
- Merrill Lynch & Co (Cash Management Account)
- American Hospital Supplies
- Minitel
- American Airlines (SABRE)
Merrill Lynch & Co
- launched 1977
- partnership with Bank One
- combined banking and investment (credit card, cheque account and brokerage service)
- by 1983: 915,000 accounts, growing at 5,000 per week, managed assets of US$ 85 Bn, 70% market share
- pre-emptive strike at competitors
American Hospital Supplies
- so successful it became Baxter Helathcare
- partially responsible for the myth you could lock-in customers
Minitel
- French government scheme for the “informatisation” of society
- extremely French
- gave away six million terminals
- intended to replace paper directory
- infamous messagerie rose
- now clashing with Internet access
Diffusion
- high-levels of job-hopping
- stories in the technical press
- suppliers
- courses
- consultants
Information partnerships
- novel incentives for customers
- novel services
- joint marketing programmes
- new channels of distribution
- operational efficiencies
Information analysis
- integration of data became possible with databases and networking
- enormous data sets (e.g., retailing)
- who has skills in this sort of analysis?
- information about
- customers
- staff
- products
Position of information systems
Five levels of IT-induced reconfiguration
Options for Network Redesign
Management in The Nineties
... there has never been such a profound analysis of the ways in which IT
can affect business performance for good or ill, nor such a complete
prescription of the measures companies must adopt if they are to stay
afloat in the uncharted waters of today’s fiercely-competitive global
marketplace.
Alan Cane Financial Times 30.iv.1990
MIT90s view of IT infrastructure
- IT platform not isolated systems
- business transformation not technological sophistication
- business criteria not cost-benefit analyses
- business domain not IS domain
- strategic manager not IS manager
- strategy-IT alignment not IT for implementation
Framework for strategic alignment
Strategic alignment process
Research issues
- role of IT in corporate performance
- management of the IS function
- assessing the benefits of BPR from:
- information technology
- bureaucratic slack
- identification of the sources of innovation
- what does it tell us about strategic management?